❓QUESTION:
Rayoka said something like 'prohibiting a person from having a weapon is prohibiting the expression of his freedom.' I really liked that idea then, although I don't live in the States, and if I did, I would probably prefer a state with a ban on carrying. But the idea still inspires me, despite the fact that war is not part of the vision of the future and development. As if there is and there is no contradiction. What do you say about this?
❗️ANSWER lee:
Any prohibition indicates the falsity of the system. The more prohibitions, the more direct confirmation that a given society uses illusion – a distortion in the understanding of the world.
The future of humanity will not have a single law with prohibitions. Moreover, when the 'cleansing' of legislative databases on the planet begins, it will be precisely the prohibitions that will reveal where negative attitudes are hidden. It will be clear where the 'diseases of society' are hidden.
Prohibitions are like paintings on the wall hiding holes.
There is no need to prohibit anything; one should look at the origins of what is being prohibited. If there is a need for violence in society, one should study what gives rise to it, rather than prohibiting the carrying of weapons (where it was originally allowed). Otherwise, the supposed solution to the problem by prohibition simply moves it to a new level. For example, all violence (prohibited for citizens) is concentrated in the hands of the state – and this is a path to dictatorship, totalitarian arbitrariness, war, and so on.
