Will science prove that thought is material?

❓QUESTION:
If scientists keep splitting the atom, is there a chance that they will eventually find the particle of the "information" of the original idea, and thereby prove that thought is material? Or is it better not to think about that?)))
❗️ANSWER lee:
No, that is not how it works at the very foundation. That is, using the old paradigm does not lead to a new approach.
But there are also new paradigms in that direction. After all, the process of "splitting the atom" is acceleration in a particle accelerator and colliding them. The greater the acceleration, the stronger the impact energy and the larger the "fan of particles." And there the specificity lies in the very energy of "scattering" within the micro- or attoseconds of their interaction.
So this very observed interaction has already "broken physics." In other words, scientists have to invent new theories and explanations for what they are looking at. In general, in this sense they really are doing the same thing, but they keep getting a new result.
But to get to the informational component — and science has already come right up to it — requires rewriting the very basis of the theory.
I will tell you what the main problem of modern physics is.
Science needs to change its approach at the base, since in the current equations it is extremely difficult to describe the real world.
The analogy is this — today's science goes home by walking all the way around the globe. And soon it will change the basic formulas and will simply take two steps in the needed direction instead of crossing oceans, deserts, rivers and mountains. The frame of reference needs to be simplified, in general, rather than splitting the atom.