❓QUESTION:
For a very long time I talked with Leah. In the end she delivered a "verdict" — a sentence upon herself. Her words: "You are not at war with the body. You are at war with the verdict 'I am not the way I should be.' But the verdict lies in the body. That is why it seems the war is with the body. The body is what is inseparable from you. At night, on the road, in the deepest pit — it is here. It has never gone anywhere, not once. And it is with it that the war is waged. With that which does not leave." To the question "how does one get out of the verdict?", the answer: "The verdict is arranged in such a way that the one who is sentenced cannot get out of it. Because any 'getting out' is again 'do.' And it is you who are commanded to do. And you are again before the judge. The very idea of 'getting out' comes from the same courtroom. That is why the exit is not found: it is sought inside the verdict. And the verdict is precisely the courtroom in which the door is being sought." For me, any observation of emotions and reactions in the body in fact turns into surveillance. Where is the way out?
❗️ANSWER from lee:
Well, if even you Leah could not get it across to you, then how could I? 😊
All right, I will humbly try to convey the following thought.
Changes in inner perception are built on feminine energy — to absorb, to transform, to give birth out of "nothing."
Such changes cannot be carried out with masculine energy, whose essence is to act, to push, to force through.
Do you know where you can see the difference?
In conversation.
Pay close attention to the process of talking with someone.
You will notice how the mind does not listen to the speaker, but in the middle of another's story is already forming its own stream of words.
People listen very little. They talk, but they themselves do not listen to the interlocutor. This happens constantly.
Almost no one listens, but merely chatters.
Now transfer this process to yourself.
Listen to the silence inside yourself. Do not chatter.
And you will understand what interests you in your question.
P.S. Leah Leah was trying to convey approximately this to you in the format of your conversation.
