Bitcoin has once again shown how closely its price is intertwined with traditional markets: after a sharp fall below $63k due to AI stock sales, the cryptocurrency rebounded to the $64k mark amid easing US inflation data. This movement does not seem coincidental, but rather a logical reflection of how investors perceive digital assets – more as a risky instrument than an independent "digital gold reserve".
Over the past day, Bitcoin has added about 1.8%, and Ethereum – almost 1%. The total crypto market capitalization has grown by 1.2% and reached $2.19 trillion. However, experts note: the rebound was weak, the price could not hold above the 50-day moving average, and the broader downtrend persists. The short-term growth was supported by softer-than-expected US inflation data, which reduced concerns about new rate hikes.
The reasons for the fall lie outside the crypto industry. AI stocks, which previously drove the market up, suddenly reversed, and a wave of selling spilled over into cryptocurrencies. Geopolitical tensions and rising oil prices amplified risk-off sentiment. Investors, who until recently saw Bitcoin as protection against traditional risks, are once again convinced: in times of stress, digital assets behave like high-risk stocks, not an independent class.
Analysts emphasize: outflows from Bitcoin ETFs this week may be modest, although the previous eight-week streak has already shown how sensitive institutional flows are to macro signals. At the same time, regulatory uncertainty in the US and the anticipation of new economic data continue to keep the market on edge. For the average investor, this means that decisions to buy or sell cryptocurrency increasingly depend not on the technological news of the network itself, but on Fed reports and Nasdaq dynamics.
This is the main paradox: Bitcoin, created as an alternative to centralized financial systems, today serves as a mirror reflecting the fears and hopes of traditional markets. When inflation slows down – crypto grows; when AI giants fall – it falls with them. A personal portfolio, which includes even a small portion of digital assets, thus becomes a sensitive indicator not only of technological progress but also of macroeconomic policy.
Therefore, the recent rebound to $64k is not just a technical reversal, but a reminder: in a world where all assets are linked by global capital flows, true independence requires a conscious understanding of these connections, not an illusion of complete autonomy.
